• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the by clicking the link above. You may have to before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. • Come on over and join in on the Trade at • VS are restricted to listing their ads to the S&S section or their VS sections. Ads listed in discussion areas are prohibited. Here's a Sears 54, also don't forget the Sears Ted Williams 100, both basically Win 94s little differences. Always thought they would make a nice liteweight shorty, with Ramline stocks and end caps. It's a Sears Model 53 chambered in 30-06 new never fired. The Father in law had a 6X Weaver mounted when purchased and doesn't remember when he bought it, best guess is pre 1975. Serial number 273320XX. Of course it would take some finagleing!! I think the 54 was first, but don't think they were Pre 64s, not sure though, then came the Ted Williams 100s. The straight stocks, and liter weight to start with, than the Marlins, along with the slimmer lines attracted me, and did I mention no rear barrel bands!!! Than shorten the mag tube, and use the Marlin style dovetailed tube hanger, would than also get rid of the front barrel band. Obviously I'm not concerned with looks, or tradition, in this regard, but I already have enough 30-30s, and currently fiddling with the 35. Sears 54 Ted Williams 100. I had a Sears labelled Winchester for a short while a few years ago, I don't remember if was a Model 54 or not. It was a Post-64 Model 94 with the main visible differences being the it had a clunky rifle style fore end cap instead of a barrel band, and the sights looked like they came from a cheap.22 instead of a centerfire rifle. It shot well enough for one of my friends' son to kill several deer over the years. RobertIf I remember right, these had a magazine tube that was about a half inch or so shorter than the Winchester 94 model being made at the time. AsI was working at Winchester when these were in production, and I used to walk through a portion of the factory where row afer row of 94s were in racks, probably after final assembly, waiting another operation (most likely packaging) You could tell the Sears guns by the slightly shorter magazine tubes. This would have been around 1969 or1970. Stripped mine down and it looks good inside. There was some build-up under the forearm. It has a stamped metal cartridge lifter and spring pins instead of solid pins, but function smoothly. The stock appears to be walnut, definately not birch. The receiver is the worst looking, with most of the bluing being splotchy looking or worn off. Typical of this generation of Winchester receivers. Not sure what I'm going to do to it. I may strip it (receiver only) and try some of my Brownells Oxpho-blue on it. I've read some stories about how these receivers take hot bluing, but not much on cold blue. ![]() We'll see soon. The receivers were made out of a sintered metal and tend to look purplish when blued. Some just strip and clear coat to look like stainless steel. I had one duracoated to look like a normal blue. There is also an outfit that has oxide type finish that works on this mystery metal.Its not sintered metal, its Ductile Iron, and yes standard hot caustic bluing makes them look purple. From the factory they were flash steel plated and that was blued. To get a good blue you can find someone that does Oxynate #84 blueing for stainless, a reverse electrolysis plated finish, ' do a search on this forum, looks good'. There was a model of post 64 94 called the Antique Carbine that came with a color case hardened receiver. I have one and it looks really good, so that is an option also, albeit an expensive one. I already own a sears 45 which is a marlin 336 in 35 rem like another member mentioned. I was looking at 1 of these sears 54's a week or 2 ago at a local shop in rough cosmetic condition. I have no idea how the internals are or how it shoots. I just know the stock and fore arm don't match the bluing on receiver is rough (and I know they don't take bluing well from past experience ). I was thinking of buying it for a project gun. I know the shop has had it for a very long time he just wants too much money for it imho. Red Alert 2 Download Free. The Red Alert 2 is single player game in free noob pc games but you can play as a multiplayer via LAN. In command and conquer the player himself let choose which side lead to victory. Command & Conquer: Red Alert 2 is a 2.5D real-time strategy computer game by Westwood Studios, which was released for Microsoft Windows on September 28, 2000 as the follow up to Command & Conquer: Red Alert. Download Setup File Command and Conquer Red Alert 2 Free Download for PC. Command & Conquer: Red Alert 2 is the sequel to Command & Conquer: Red Alert. It was released by EA Games and developed by Westwood Studios on October 20, 2000. The game features fully recited images expressly expressed in a B-movie style. Command and conquer red alert 2 free download kickass. Command And Conquer Red Alert 2 + Yuri’s Revenge. Command & Conquer Yuris Revenge Free Download PC Game Cracked in Direct Link and Torrent. Yuri’s Revenge is a traditional real-time strategy. How To Install Command & Conquer Yuri’s Revenge Free Download. He has 250 $ on it this sho isn't known for wheeling and dealing so idk if he would come down any or not. He probably only gave the guy who sold it a 50$ bill for it. I already own a sears 45 which is a marlin 336 in 35 rem like another member mentioned. I was looking at 1 of these sears 54's a week or 2 ago at a local shop in rough cosmetic condition. I have no idea how the internals are or how it shoots. I just know the stock and fore arm don't match the bluing on receiver is rough (and I know they don't take bluing well from past experience ). I was thinking of buying it for a project gun. I know the shop has had it for a very long time he just wants too much money for it imho. He has 250 $ on it this sho isn't known for wheeling and dealing so idk if he would come down any or not.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |